Removing the "w:" prefix

[Daniel Danilatos]

Hi all,

For some time now it's been our desire to remove the annoying "w:" prefix
from various element names. It was originally there when our wave XML was
going to be some kind of fancy superset of XHTML, with the extra elements
being namespaced. But we've since moved far beyond that, e.g. replacing <p>
with <line> elements, so the "w:" is little more than historical cruft.

There are a bunch of other data changes that need to happen in the near
future anyway, so this is a good opportunity to start cleaning up the cruft.
I'll probably be sending out patches in the near future.

Dan

[Alex North]

SGTM

Post by Daniel Danilatos
Hi all,
For some time now it's been our desire to remove the annoying "w:" prefix
from various element names. It was originally there when our wave XML was
going to be some kind of fancy superset of XHTML, with the extra elements
being namespaced. But we've since moved far beyond that, e.g. replacing <p>
with <line> elements, so the "w:" is little more than historical cruft.
There are a bunch of other data changes that need to happen in the near
future anyway, so this is a good opportunity to start cleaning up the cruft.
I'll probably be sending out patches in the near future.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

[Daniel Danilatos]

Heads up: I'm writing the code to do this now.

Dan

Óôéò 10 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2010 11:42 ð.ì., ï ÷ñÞóôçò Alex North

Post by Daniel Danilatos
SGTM

Post by Daniel Danilatos
Hi all,
For some time now it's been our desire to remove the annoying "w:" prefix
from various element names. It was originally there when our wave XML was
going to be some kind of fancy superset of XHTML, with the extra elements
being namespaced. But we've since moved far beyond that, e.g. replacing <p>
with <line> elements, so the "w:" is little more than historical cruft.
There are a bunch of other data changes that need to happen in the near
future anyway, so this is a good opportunity to start cleaning up the cruft.
I'll probably be sending out patches in the near future.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

[Daniel Danilatos]

http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/487001/

<http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/487001/>When it gets submitted, if
you've actually got some kind of persistence hooked up, and you care about
the data, you'll need to run the migration logic in
org.waveprotocol.wave.migration. There's not much in there yet, but I will
be adding more as I do more data format cleanups. There's also some
migration logic for link annotations, but the code hasn't been updated to
take the new format.

Dan

Óôéò 6 Éáíïõáñßïõ 2011 2:09 ì.ì., ï ÷ñÞóôçò Daniel Danilatos <

Post by Daniel Danilatos
Heads up: I'm writing the code to do this now.
Dan
Óôéò 10 Äåêåìâñßïõ 2010 11:42 ð.ì., ï ÷ñÞóôçò Alex North <
SGTM

Post by Daniel Danilatos

Post by Daniel Danilatos
Hi all,
For some time now it's been our desire to remove the annoying "w:" prefix
from various element names. It was originally there when our wave XML was
going to be some kind of fancy superset of XHTML, with the extra elements
being namespaced. But we've since moved far beyond that, e.g. replacing <p>
with <line> elements, so the "w:" is little more than historical cruft.
There are a bunch of other data changes that need to happen in the near
future anyway, so this is a good opportunity to start cleaning up the cruft.
I'll probably be sending out patches in the near future.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.