Dan Peterson
2010-12-07 04:53:09 UTC
Hi everyone,
As we prepare to move over to the Apache infrastructure, please go ahead and
sign up to the proper mailing list: send an email to
wave-dev-subscribe-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org and that will provision your email
address as member of wave-dev-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
-Dan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alex North <anorth-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Search wave design proposal
To: wave-protocol-/***@public.gmane.org
I think we should allow a small grace period for people to sign up to the
apache list. I only just did after processing an email back-log. Let's make
a loud announcement here that everyone should subscribe to the apache lists,
then make an atomic break where we lock out posting to this list and begin
posting on the apache one.
And let's further discuss this in some other thread.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to wave-protocol-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
wave-protocol+unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org<wave-protocol%2Bunsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
As we prepare to move over to the Apache infrastructure, please go ahead and
sign up to the proper mailing list: send an email to
wave-dev-subscribe-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org and that will provision your email
address as member of wave-dev-d1GL8uUpDdXTxqt0kkDzDmD2FQJk+8+***@public.gmane.org
-Dan
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alex North <anorth-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+***@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: Search wave design proposal
To: wave-protocol-/***@public.gmane.org
I think we should allow a small grace period for people to sign up to the
apache list. I only just did after processing an email back-log. Let's make
a loud announcement here that everyone should subscribe to the apache lists,
then make an atomic break where we lock out posting to this list and begin
posting on the apache one.
And let's further discuss this in some other thread.
Friendly suggestion -- shall we move this conversation over to
This means that we all need to sign up to that list. To sign up send an
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
--This means that we all need to sign up to that list. To sign up send an
I like the idea of managing indexes, search results, and folders in
wavelets.
I also like the idea of making the search request in a wavelet. Say,
placing the query in a document named "query" and the results would appear
in documents starting with "result+". If we added the concept of transient
wavelets (say all placed in a wave named "transient"), then it would be
easier for clients to know what wavelets should not be persisted locally.
-Tad
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
--wavelets.
I also like the idea of making the search request in a wavelet. Say,
placing the query in a document named "query" and the results would appear
in documents starting with "result+". If we added the concept of transient
wavelets (say all placed in a wave named "transient"), then it would be
easier for clients to know what wavelets should not be persisted locally.
-Tad
Hey all,
A few months ago Joseph and I worked on a design for using a wave as the
communication transport for search results, including your inbox. We then
decided that while this mechanism is good and wavey, Wave in a Box would be
better served by first taking advantage of the search Data API to get basic
inbox and search functionality without adding so much code.
I'm publishing the design now just because it's come up in a few
conversations. I don't think we should implement it (or something like it)
yet, but perhaps some time next year after basic WIAB is up and functional.
https://sites.google.com/a/waveprotocol.org/wave-protocol/protocol/design-proposals/search-wave-design-proposal
A.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
--A few months ago Joseph and I worked on a design for using a wave as the
communication transport for search results, including your inbox. We then
decided that while this mechanism is good and wavey, Wave in a Box would be
better served by first taking advantage of the search Data API to get basic
inbox and search functionality without adding so much code.
I'm publishing the design now just because it's come up in a few
conversations. I don't think we should implement it (or something like it)
yet, but perhaps some time next year after basic WIAB is up and functional.
https://sites.google.com/a/waveprotocol.org/wave-protocol/protocol/design-proposals/search-wave-design-proposal
A.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wave Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to wave-protocol-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
wave-protocol+unsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org<wave-protocol%2Bunsubscribe-/***@public.gmane.org>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to wave-protocol-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wave-protocol+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to wave-protocol-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wave-protocol+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.